Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 65 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 4.1, 4.0 |
| 2023-04-17 | 2012-09-28 |
| 9.42 x 6.22 x 0.30 inches | 10.10 x 6.90 x 0.38 inches |
| 15.34 ounces | 20.70 ounces |
| Glacier Blue and Space Grey | -- |
| $ 140.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.3 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1280 x 800 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super PLS LCD |
| 214 pixels per inch | 149 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.3 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali G57 MP1 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 5.72 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 3.00 MP + 0.30 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7680mAh Battery | 7000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 624 hours standby time |
| 8.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 (AT&T) has an overall score of 65, which is better than OSCAL Pad 13's 57.3 overall score. Both of these tablets include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 (AT&T) has the previous 4.1 version and OSCAL Pad 13 has Android 12 version. The Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 (AT&T) body is noticeably older, notably heavier and a lot thicker than the OSCAL Pad 13.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 (AT&T) features a much better screen than OSCAL Pad 13, although it has a quite smaller screen, a lot worse count of pixels per display inch and a way lower 800 x 1280 resolution. Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 (AT&T) counts with a much faster processor than OSCAL Pad 13, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 6 less cpu cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
The OSCAL Pad 13 counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 (AT&T), because it has a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back. OSCAL Pad 13 counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 (AT&T), because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 240 GB more internal storage capacity.
The OSCAL Pad 13 features a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 (AT&T), because it has a 10 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 (AT&T) is a lot more expensive than the OSCAL Pad 13, but you can get a better tablet for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.