| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 67.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2023-04-17 | 2014-04-01 |
| 9.42 x 6.22 x 0.30 inches | 9.58 x 6.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 15.34 ounces | 17.18 ounces |
| Glacier Blue and Space Grey | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 140.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.3 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1280 x 800 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 214 pixels per inch | 149 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.3 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 1,5 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali G57 MP1 GPU | Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 3.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 6.38 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 2.4 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7680mAh Battery | 6800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 8.8 | 8.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 has an overall score of 67.8, which is much better than OSCAL Pad 13's 57.3 global score. Despite being the best portable tablet we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 is a much older, somewhat heavier and just a little thicker portable tablet than the OSCAL Pad 13. These devices work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 has the newer 4.4.2 version while OSCAL Pad 13 has Android 12 version, so it provides you a couple additional features and optimized performance.
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 counts with a brighter screen than OSCAL Pad 13, although it has a way worse pixels density, a lot worse 800 x 1280 pixels resolution and a bit smaller display. Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 has a much more powerful processor than OSCAL Pad 13, because although it has 4 less processing cores and 6,5 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with an additional GPU.
The OSCAL Pad 13 features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Tab 4 10.1, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory. OSCAL Pad 13 features a bit better camera than Galaxy Tab 4 10.1, because it has a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
OSCAL Pad 13 counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1, because it has a 7680mAh battery capacity instead of 6800mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper, making it an easy choice.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.