Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 70.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2023-04-17 | 2016-06-01 |
| 9.42 x 6.22 x 0.30 inches | 10.01 x 6.11 x 0.32 inches |
| 15.34 ounces | 18.52 ounces |
| Glacier Blue and Space Grey | 16 777 216 |
| $ 140.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.3 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super PLS LCD |
| 214 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.3 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali G57 MP1 GPU | Mali-T830 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 7.16 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7680mAh Battery | 7300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.8 | 8.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) is a lot better than the OSCAL Pad 13, having a general score of 70.2 against 57.3. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) has a newer 8.1 Oreo version and OSCAL Pad 13 has Android 12, giving some additional features. Even being the best we compare here, Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) is a much older, somewhat heavier and a bit thicker tablet than the OSCAL Pad 13.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) features a slightly better looking display than OSCAL Pad 13, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1200 x 1920px and a little more pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) features a way better performance than OSCAL Pad 13, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) takes much better photos and videos than OSCAL Pad 13, although it has a camera with much less mega-pixels. The OSCAL Pad 13 counts with a superior memory for apps and games than Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016), because it has 256 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
OSCAL Pad 13 features just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016), because it has a 5% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.