| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-04-17 | 2019-04-26 |
| 9.42 x 6.22 x 0.30 inches | 9.65 x 5.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 15.34 ounces | 16.54 ounces |
| Glacier Blue and Space Grey | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 140.00 | $ 330.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.3 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 214 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.3 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali G57 MP1 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7680mAh Battery | 6150mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.8 | 7.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
The Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) is much better than OSCAL Pad 13, having a score of 76.7 against 57.3. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) has 11 version while OSCAL Pad 13 has Android 12. The Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) is a just a little heavier tablet device than the OSCAL Pad 13, but they are equally thin.
Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) counts with a much more powerful processor than OSCAL Pad 13, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) features a bit better looking display than OSCAL Pad 13, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater display density and a bit higher 1200 x 1920 pixels resolution.
OSCAL Pad 13 features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019), because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) features a much better camera than OSCAL Pad 13, although it has a back camera with a lot lower resolution.
The OSCAL Pad 13 counts with longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019), because it has 7680mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) costs a lot more money than the OSCAL Pad 13, but you can get a much better tablet for that few more dollars.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.