Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 74.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2023-04-17 | 2018-08-24 |
| 9.42 x 6.22 x 0.30 inches | 10.24 x 6.34 x 0.31 inches |
| 15.34 ounces | 18.84 ounces |
| Glacier Blue and Space Grey | Black, Blue and Gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 140.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.3 inches | 10.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 214 pixels per inch | 216 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.3 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali G57 MP1 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7680mAh Battery | 7300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.8 | 8.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 has an overall score of 74.5, which is a lot better than the OSCAL Pad 13's general score of 57.3. Both tablets in this comparison work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 has the newer 9.0 Pie version and OSCAL Pad 13 has Android 12 version. Although it's the best we are comparing here, it must be told that it is also much older, a bit thicker and heavier.
The Galaxy Tab A 10.5 features a bit better looking screen than OSCAL Pad 13, because it has a slightly higher 1200 x 1920 resolution, a bit better amount of pixels per inch of screen and a bit bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 has a way better performance than OSCAL Pad 13, although it has 5 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Galaxy Tab A 10.5 shoots way better pictures and videos than OSCAL Pad 13, although it has a camera with a much worse 8 megapixels resolution. The OSCAL Pad 13 counts with a superior memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Tab A 10.5, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB.
OSCAL Pad 13 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Tab A 10.5, because it has a 7680mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy Tab A 10.5 is a lot more expensive than the OSCAL Pad 13, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better tablet for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.