Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 60.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 5.1 Lollipop |
| 2023-04-17 | 2016-04-01 |
| 9.42 x 6.22 x 0.30 inches | 7.36 x 4.28 x 0.34 inches |
| 15.34 ounces | 9.98 ounces |
| Glacier Blue and Space Grey | 16 777 216 |
| $ 140.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.3 inches | 7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1280 x 800 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 214 pixels per inch | 216 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 1,5 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali G57 MP1 GPU | Mali-T720 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.19 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 6.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 6.71 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7680mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Tab A (2016) has a global score of 60.4, which is slightly better than OSCAL Pad 13's 57.3 score. These tablets come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Tab A (2016) has the newer 5.1 Lollipop version while OSCAL Pad 13 has Android 12 version. Galaxy Tab A (2016)'s design is incredibly lighter than OSCAL Pad 13, but it's thicker and was released many years before.
Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016) counts with a little bit better display than OSCAL Pad 13, because although it has a way smaller screen and a lot lower 800 x 1280 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch. OSCAL Pad 13 features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Tab A (2016), because it has 248 GB more internal memory and an external memory card slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Galaxy Tab A (2016) features an extremely better processor than OSCAL Pad 13, although it has less CPU cores and lesser RAM. The OSCAL Pad 13 counts with a much better battery performance than Galaxy Tab A (2016), because it has a 92 percent greater battery size. The OSCAL Pad 13 takes a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016), because it has a camera with much more mega pixels.
The Galaxy Tab A (2016) costs a little more than OSCAL Pad 13, but you can get a better tablet for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.