Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 60.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 5.0 |
| 2023-04-17 | 2015-04-20 |
| 9.42 x 6.22 x 0.30 inches | 8.20 x 5.43 x 0.29 inches |
| 15.34 ounces | 11.04 ounces |
| Glacier Blue and Space Grey | Blue, Gray and White |
| $ 140.00 | $ 139.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 768 x 1024 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 214 pixels per inch | 160 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.3 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 1,5 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali G57 MP1 GPU | Adreno 306 GPU |
| 6.21 | 7.65 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 2.4 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7680mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 is just a bit better than the OSCAL Pad 13, getting a 60.1 score against 57.3. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 is older than the OSCAL Pad 13, it's construction is way lighter and just a bit thinner. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 has older 5.0 version while OSCAL Pad 13 has Android 12.
Galaxy Tab A 8.0 features a lot better performance than OSCAL Pad 13, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 7 lesser processing cores (but faster). The Galaxy Tab A 8.0 features a brighter screen than OSCAL Pad 13, although it has a lot smaller display, a way worse resolution of 1024 x 768px and a much worse display density.
OSCAL Pad 13 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Tab A 8.0, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. OSCAL Pad 13 has a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0, because it has an 83 percent larger battery capacity.
The OSCAL Pad 13 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0, because it has a back camera with a way better 13 mega pixels resolution.
Despite of being the best tablet in our comparison, Galaxy Tab A 8.0 is also the cheapest, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
