Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2023-04-17 | 2020-09-28 |
| 9.42 x 6.22 x 0.30 inches | 8.42 x 4.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 15.34 ounces | 15.03 ounces |
| Glacier Blue and Space Grey | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 140.00 | $ 490.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 214 pixels per inch | 283 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.3 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali G57 MP1 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| 2.4 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7680mAh Battery | 5050mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 8.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Tab Active 3 is way better than the OSCAL Pad 13, having a 79 score against 57.3. Galaxy Tab Active 3's body is a little bit lighter than OSCAL Pad 13, but it's a lot thicker and was released 3 years before. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Tab Active 3 has the older 10 version while OSCAL Pad 13 has Android 12 version.
Galaxy Tab Active 3 has a much better looking screen than OSCAL Pad 13, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a slightly better resolution of 1200 x 1920. OSCAL Pad 13 has much more storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 3, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB, the OSCAL Pad 13 also has more internal memory.
The Galaxy Tab Active 3 has a much faster processing unit than OSCAL Pad 13, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. OSCAL Pad 13 counts with a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 3, because it has 7680mAh of battery capacity instead of 5050mAh.
The Galaxy Tab Active 3 has a lot better camera than OSCAL Pad 13. Both of them have a 13 mega pixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy Tab Active 3 is a lot more expensive than OSCAL Pad 13, but you can get a much better tablet for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.