Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 64.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 5.1 Lollipop |
| 2023-04-17 | 2016-02-18 |
| 9.42 x 6.22 x 0.30 inches | 8.35 x 4.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 15.34 ounces | 12.67 ounces |
| Glacier Blue and Space Grey | 16 777 216 |
| $ 140.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1280 x 800 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 214 pixels per inch | 189 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.3 | 6.4 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 1,5 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali G57 MP1 GPU | Adreno 306 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.1 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G) |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 5.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7680mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Tab E 8.0 is much better than OSCAL Pad 13, with a 64.9 score against 57.3. Both of these tablets come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Tab E 8.0 has newer 5.1 Lollipop version and OSCAL Pad 13 has Android 12, offering a couple nice extra features and optimized performance. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Tab E 8.0 is noticeably older and thicker than the OSCAL Pad 13, it's design is still somewhat lighter.
Samsung Galaxy Tab E 8.0 features a lot better hardware performance than OSCAL Pad 13, although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Tab E 8.0 counts with a bit better looking screen than OSCAL Pad 13, although it has a lot lower resolution of 800 x 1280 pixels, a really smaller display and a quite worse pixels quantity per inch of display.
Galaxy Tab E 8.0 takes much better photographs and videos than OSCAL Pad 13, although it has a camera in the back with lot less mega-pixels resolution. The OSCAL Pad 13 counts with a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Tab E 8.0, because it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB and 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The OSCAL Pad 13 has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Tab E 8.0, because it has a 7680mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.