| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 57.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 2.2 |
| 2023-04-17 | 2010-09-02 |
| 9.42 x 6.22 x 0.30 inches | 7.48 x 4.74 x 0.47 inches |
| 15.34 ounces | 13.40 ounces |
| Glacier Blue and Space Grey | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 140.00 | $ 465.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.3 inches | 7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1024 x 600 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 214 pixels per inch | 170 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 3 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A8 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 640 MB RAM |
| ARM Mali G57 MP1 GPU | PowerVR SGX540 (200 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 7.56 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 4.4 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 3.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| -- | 720 x 480 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 6.16 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 2.4 | 3.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7680mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 650 hours standby time |
| 8.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor |
The Samsung Galaxy Tab T-Mobile has an overall score of 57.6, which is a little bit better than OSCAL Pad 13's score of 57.3. Both tablets we are comparing here come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Tab T-Mobile has the older 2.2 version and OSCAL Pad 13 has Android 12 version. Samsung Galaxy Tab T-Mobile is a noticeably older and extremely thicker tablet than the OSCAL Pad 13, but Samsung managed to make it somewhat lighter anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab T-Mobile has a little sharper screen than OSCAL Pad 13, although it has a way lower 600 x 1024 resolution, a much smaller display and a just a bit worse screen pixel density. OSCAL Pad 13 has a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Tab T-Mobile, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Tab T-Mobile has a much powerful CPU than OSCAL Pad 13, because although it has less RAM and an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processor. OSCAL Pad 13 shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Tab T-Mobile, because it has a camera with a way higher resolution.
OSCAL Pad 13 has a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Tab T-Mobile, because it has a 7680mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Galaxy Tab T-Mobile is a better device, it costs a lot more than OSCAL Pad 13, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the OSCAL Pad 13. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy OSCAL Pad 13, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.