Search


Compare tablets

Amazon Fire HDX 8.9

Wi-Fi Only (2014)
Global Score
64.467.9
Basic Information
Amazon
Android 13Android 4.4
--2014-10-21
9.70 x 6.15 x 0.30 inches9.10 x 6.20 x 0.30 inches
15.84 ounces13.23 ounces
Plastic and Plastic--
--$ 479.00
Display / Screen
10.4 inches8.9 inches
1200 x 1200 pixels 2560 x 1600 pixels
IPS LCDLCD
163 pixels per inch339 pixels per inch
330 cd/m2 brightness--
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
6.78.7
Performance
Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset
Octa-Core 1600 MHz processorKrait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor
8 GB RAM2 GB (800 MHz) RAM
Mali-G57 MC1 GPUAdreno 420 Blaze GPU
8.919.09
Storage
256 GB internal memory64 GB internal memory
microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slotNo SD card slot
17.347.7
Camera
13.00 MP + 16.00 MP8.00 MP
--f/2.20 aperture
--1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution
7.046.82
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
--LTE (4G), HSPA, EDGE and GPRS
2.46.3
Battery Life
8280mAh Battery--
Non-Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
9.21.36
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0Bluetooth 4.1
GPSGPS
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer, Gyroscope and Light Sensor
FM Radio--

Comparison review

Amazon Fire HDX 8.9 is a little bit better than OSCAL Pad 15, with a 67.9 score against 64.4. Amazon Fire HDX 8.9 is a lighter device than the OSCAL Pad 15, but both of them are equally thin. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Amazon Fire HDX 8.9 has the older 4.4 version and OSCAL Pad 15 has Android 13.

The Amazon Fire HDX 8.9 counts with a much better looking display than OSCAL Pad 15, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1600 x 2560 resolution and a lot better pixels number per display inch. OSCAL Pad 15 counts with much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Amazon Fire HDX 8.9, because it has 256 GB internal memory and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.

The Amazon Fire HDX 8.9 counts with a bit superior processor than OSCAL Pad 15, although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM. The OSCAL Pad 15 has a slightly better camera than Amazon Fire HDX 8.9, because it has a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.

The OSCAL Pad 15 features a much longer battery life than Amazon Fire HDX 8.9.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.