| Global Score | |
| 64.4 | 68.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Amazon | |
| Android 13 | Android 4.2.2 |
| -- | 2013-09-25 |
| 9.70 x 6.15 x 0.30 inches | 9.09 x 6.22 x 0.31 inches |
| 15.84 ounces | 13.55 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.4 inches | 8.9 inches |
| 1200 x 1200 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 163 pixels per inch | 339 pixels per inch |
| 330 cd/m2 brightness | 400 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8074 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC1 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| 7.04 | 6.82 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS |
| 2.4 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8280mAh Battery | -- |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
The Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9 is slightly better than the OSCAL Pad 15, having a 68.5 score against 64.4. Both tablets in our current comparison use Android operating system, but Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9 has a newer 4.2.2 version and OSCAL Pad 15 has Android 13, providing some extra features. The Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9 is a a bit thicker but somewhat lighter device than the OSCAL Pad 15.
Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9 features a much more vibrant display than OSCAL Pad 15, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1600 x 2560px, a little more brightness and a much higher pixel quantity per screen inch. The Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9 features a bit more powerful processing unit than OSCAL Pad 15, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor.
The OSCAL Pad 15 takes slightly better photos and videos than Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9, because it has a much more mega pixels camera. The OSCAL Pad 15 has a very superior storage for games and applications than Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
OSCAL Pad 15 has a way better battery performance than Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.