Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 64.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2019-09-25 |
| 9.70 x 6.15 x 0.30 inches | 9.80 x 6.80 x 0.29 inches |
| 15.84 ounces | 17.39 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 559.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.4 inches | 10.2 inches |
| 1200 x 1200 pixels | 2160 x 1620 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 163 pixels per inch | 265 pixels per inch |
| 330 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor | Hurricane and Zephyr, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC1 GPU | PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.20 MP |
| -- | f/2.40 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8280mAh Battery | 8827mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 9.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPad 10.2-inch is a lot better than the OSCAL Pad 15, getting a general score of 79.3 against 64.4. The Apple iPad 10.2-inch is a a little bit thinner but a little heavier portable tablet than the OSCAL Pad 15. The Apple iPad 10.2-inch has a sharper screen than OSCAL Pad 15, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher display pixels density, a lot higher 1620 x 2160 pixels resolution and way more brightness.
OSCAL Pad 15 has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPad 10.2-inch, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Apple iPad 10.2-inch counts with just a bit better hardware performance than OSCAL Pad 15, although it has 4 lesser cores (although faster) and 5 GB less RAM.
The Apple iPad 10.2-inch counts with a bit longer battery duration than OSCAL Pad 15, because it has an 8827mAh battery size. The Apple iPad 10.2-inch features a much better camera than OSCAL Pad 15, although it has a much less mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.