Compare tablets
Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702
256 GB Core i5| Global Score | |
| 64.4 | 59.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Fujitsu | |
| Android 13 | Windows 8 Pro |
| 9.70 x 6.15 x 0.30 inches | 11.89 x 7.68 x 0.50 inches |
| 15.84 ounces | 29.92 ounces |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.4 inches | 11.6 inches |
| 1200 x 1200 pixels | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AH-IPS |
| 163 pixels per inch | 135 pixels per inch |
| 330 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | -- |
| Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor | Intel Core i5-3427U (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC1 GPU | Intel HD Graphics 4000 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | SD, SDHC external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8280mAh Battery | 3150mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The OSCAL Pad 15 is slightly better than the Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, with a general score of 64.4 against 59.2. OSCAL Pad 15 has Android 13 OS, while Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 comes with Windows 8 Pro OS. The OSCAL Pad 15 design is notably thinner and noticeably lighter than the Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702.
The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702's processing unit is very similar to the OSCAL Pad 15 one, because although the Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 has lesser cores (although they are faster) and less RAM memory, it also counts with an extra GPU. Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 counts with a slightly better display than OSCAL Pad 15, because although it has a little worse 768 x 1366 resolution and a little worse pixels amount per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite bigger screen.
OSCAL Pad 15 counts with a greater camera than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels. The OSCAL Pad 15 has much more memory for applications and games than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702. They have equal internal storage. The OSCAL Pad 15 features a really longer battery performance than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has an 8280mAh battery capacity instead of 3150mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.