Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 64.4 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 9.70 x 6.15 x 0.30 inches | 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 15.84 ounces | 19.29 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.4 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1200 x 1200 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super Clear LCD |
| 163 pixels per inch | 299 pixels per inch |
| 330 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC1 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 2.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8280mAh Battery | 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 43 hours talk time |
| 9.2 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
GALAXY Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) has an overall score of 77.4, which is much better than OSCAL Pad 15's 64.4 general score. These tablets use Android OS (operating system), but GALAXY Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) has a newer 4.4.2 version and OSCAL Pad 15 has Android 13 version, giving a couple nice extra features and enhanced performance. Although it's the best in our current comparison, the GALAXY Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) construction is somewhat heavier and just a little thicker than the OSCAL Pad 15.
GALAXY Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) counts with a much better screen than OSCAL Pad 15, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher 1600 x 2560 resolution and much more pixels per display inch. OSCAL Pad 15 counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than GALAXY Note 10.1 (2014 Edition), because it has 192 GB more internal storage and an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The GALAXY Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) features a bit more powerful CPU than OSCAL Pad 15, because although it has less RAM memory and 4 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processor. OSCAL Pad 15 features just a bit better battery lifetime than GALAXY Note 10.1 (2014 Edition), because it has a 1 percent bigger battery capacity.
The OSCAL Pad 15 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung GALAXY Note 10.1 (2014 Edition), because it has a camera with a lot better 13 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.