Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 64.4 | 70.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-06-01 |
| 9.70 x 6.15 x 0.30 inches | 10.01 x 6.11 x 0.32 inches |
| 15.84 ounces | 18.52 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.4 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1200 x 1200 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super PLS LCD |
| 163 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| 330 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC1 GPU | Mali-T830 MP2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 7.16 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8280mAh Battery | 7300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 8.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) has a general score of 70.2, which is a bit better than the OSCAL Pad 15's 64.4 general score. The Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) construction is just a little thicker and heavier than OSCAL Pad 15. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) has the newer 8.1 Oreo version and OSCAL Pad 15 has Android 13 version.
The Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) features just a bit better looking display than OSCAL Pad 15, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better screen density and a higher resolution of 1200 x 1920 pixels. The OSCAL Pad 15 has a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016), because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
OSCAL Pad 15 has a little faster processor than Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OSCAL Pad 15 also has 6 GB more RAM. OSCAL Pad 15 has just a little better battery duration than Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016), because it has an 8280mAh battery capacity. Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) features a much better camera than OSCAL Pad 15, although it has a camera with a way lower 8 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.