Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 64.4 | 64.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android |
| -- | 2014-05-15 |
| 9.70 x 6.15 x 0.30 inches | 7.96 x 5.33 x 0.33 inches |
| 15.84 ounces | 12.70 ounces |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.4 inches | 7.9 inches |
| 1200 x 1200 pixels | 1536 x 2048 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 163 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 330 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | Nvidia Tegra K1 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC1 GPU | Kepler GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8280mAh Battery | 6700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 8.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | -- |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The OSCAL Pad 15 has a general score of 64.4, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi MiPad's 64.4 score. The OSCAL Pad 15 design is a bit thinner but somewhat heavier than the Xiaomi MiPad. The Xiaomi MiPad has a lot better looking screen than OSCAL Pad 15, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with way more pixels per inch of screen and a way better 2048 x 1536 resolution.
The Xiaomi MiPad and OSCAL Pad 15 both have extremely similar processors, although the Xiaomi MiPad has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi MiPad captures a little bit better pictures and videos than OSCAL Pad 15, although it has a way worse resolution back camera.
The OSCAL Pad 15 has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi MiPad, because it has 256 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. OSCAL Pad 15 has greater battery life than Xiaomi MiPad, because it has 8280mAh of battery capacity against 6700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.