Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
56.585.9
Basic Information
Apple
Android 14--
--2019-03-18
--9.80 x 6.80 x 0.24 inches
18.34 ounces16.37 ounces
Space Grey; Sky BlueGold, Gray and Silver
--Aluminum
--$ 779.00
Display / Screen
10.1 inches10.5 inches
--2224 x 1668 pixels
IPS LCD IPS LCD
--265 pixels per inch
--500 cd/m2 brightness
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.27.8
Performance
Rockchip RK3562 chipsetApple A12 Bionic APL1W81 chipset
Octa-Core 2000 MHz processor64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2490 MHz) processor
4 GB RAM3 GB RAM
Mali-G52 GPUApple 4-core GPU GPU
9.0910.35
Storage
128 GB internal memory256 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
10.113.3
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP8.00 MP + 7.00 MP
f/2.00 aperturef/2.40 aperture
--1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution
7.928.91
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA
--Nano SIM, Dual SIM
06.1
Battery Life
6580mAh Li - Ion Battery8134mAh Li - Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
89.04
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 5.0
--GPS
--Fingerprint ID Scanner
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer, Barometer, Gyroscope and Light Sensor

Comparison review

IPad Air (2019) has a score of 85.9, which is much better than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi's score of 56.5. The Apple iPad Air (2019) features a quite better performance than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, because although it has 1 GB less RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Apple iPad Air (2019) also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.

Apple iPad Air (2019) counts with a way better looking screen than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, because it has a bit larger display. IPad Air (2019) has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The iPad Air (2019) features superior battery duration than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, because it has a 24% larger battery size.

IPad Air (2019) captures better videos and photos than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting photos and videos in low light situations and a camera in the back with a much lower 8 mega-pixels resolution.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.