Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
56.562.2
Basic Information
Asus
Android 14--
--2015-07-10
--8.00 x 5.30 x 0.26 inches
18.34 ounces10.51 ounces
Space Grey; Sky Blue16 777 216
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
Display / Screen
10.1 inches8 inches
--2048 x 1536 pixels
IPS LCD IPS LCD
--320 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.27.6
Performance
Rockchip RK3562 chipsetIntel Atom Z3580 chipset
Octa-Core 2000 MHz processor64-bit, 22 nm (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor
4 GB RAM4 GB RAM
Mali-G52 GPUPowerVR G6430 GPU
9.099
Storage
128 GB internal memory64 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot
10.110.02
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP8.00 MP + 5.00 MP
f/2.00 aperture--
--1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution
7.926.49
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
03
Battery Life
6580mAh Li - Ion Battery Ni - MH Battery
Non-Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
81.36
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 4.1
--GPS
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor

Comparison review

Asus ZenPad S 8.0 is better than the OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, with a 62.2 score against 56.5. OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi features a bit faster CPU than Asus ZenPad S 8.0, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi also has a larger number of cores (although they are slower). The Asus ZenPad S 8.0 has a much better display than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, although it has a way smaller screen.

OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi features a little bit more memory to install games and applications than Asus ZenPad S 8.0, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi counts with a way better battery lifetime than Asus ZenPad S 8.0. OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi takes much clearer pictures and videos than Asus ZenPad S 8.0, because it has a back facing camera with a much better 13 MP resolution.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.