Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
56.574.5
Basic Information
Google
Android 14Android 5.0
--2014-10-15
--8.99 x 6.05 x 0.31 inches
18.34 ounces15.38 ounces
Space Grey; Sky BlueBlack, Brown and White
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
--$ 249.00
Display / Screen
10.1 inches8.9 inches
--1536 x 2048 pixels
IPS LCD IPS LCD
--288 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
6.28.4
Performance
Rockchip RK3562 chipsetNVIDIA Tegra K1 chipset
Octa-Core 2000 MHz processor64-bit Denver (Dual-Core 2300 MHz) processor
4 GB RAM2 GB RAM
Mali-G52 GPUKepler DX1 GPU
9.099.36
Storage
128 GB internal memory32 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
10.15.8
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP8.00 MP + 1.60 MP
f/2.00 aperturef/2.40 aperture
--1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution
7.927.26
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
--LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
--SIM
06.4
Battery Life
6580mAh Li - Ion Battery6700mAh Li-Polymer Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
88.08
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 4.0
--GPS
--NFC
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor

Comparison review

Google Nexus 9 has an overall score of 74.5, which is much better than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi's 56.5 score. Both tablets we are comparing here have Android OS, but Google Nexus 9 has the older 5.0 version and OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi has Android 14 version. The Google Nexus 9 has a bit superior CPU than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.

The Google Nexus 9 features a much sharper display than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, although it has a little smaller display. OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Google Nexus 9, because it has 96 GB more internal storage. The Google Nexus 9 counts with a little better battery lifetime than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, because it has 6700mAh of battery capacity.

The OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi features a slightly better camera than Google Nexus 9, because it has a camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better low-light captures and video.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.