Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
56.559.4
Basic Information
Google
Android 14Android 6.0
--2015-09-29
--9.53 x 7.05 x 0.28 inches
18.34 ounces17.60 ounces
Space Grey; Sky Blue--
--Aluminum
--$ 645.00
Display / Screen
10.1 inches10.2 inches
--2560 x 1800 pixels
IPS LCD LCD
--307 pixels per inch
--500 cd/m2 brightness
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
6.29
Performance
Rockchip RK3562 chipsetNVIDIA Tegra X1 chipset
Octa-Core 2000 MHz processor processor
4 GB RAM3 GB RAM
Mali-G52 GPUNVIDIA Maxwell GPU
9.096.03
Storage
128 GB internal memory64 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
10.17.7
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP8.00 MP + 2.10 MP
f/2.00 aperture--
--1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution
7.926.49
Networks
--Wi-Fi
02.4
Battery Life
6580mAh Li - Ion Battery--
Non-Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
81.36
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 4.1
--GPS
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

The Google Pixel C is a little bit better than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, having a 59.4 score against 56.5. Both of these tablets use Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel C has an older 6.0 version while OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi has Android 14. The Google Pixel C has a much more vibrant display than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, because it has a little bigger display.

The OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi counts with an extremely better CPU than Google Pixel C, because it has more cores and 1 GB more RAM memory. The OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel C, because it has 128 GB internal storage. The OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi has a way better battery duration than Google Pixel C.

OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel C, because it has a back camera with much more MP.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.