Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
56.566.3
Basic Information
Microsoft
Android 14--
--2015-05-01
--10.51 x 7.36 x 0.34 inches
18.34 ounces21.92 ounces
Space Grey; Sky Blue--
--$ 375.00
Display / Screen
10.1 inches10.8 inches
--1280 x 1920 pixels
IPS LCD --
--214 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.26.8
Performance
Rockchip RK3562 chipsetIntel Atom x7 Z8700 chipset
Octa-Core 2000 MHz processor64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor
4 GB RAM4 GB RAM
Mali-G52 GPUIntel HD GPU
9.098.55
Storage
128 GB internal memory128 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
10.110.1
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP8.00 MP + 3.50 MP
f/2.00 aperture--
--1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution
7.926.49
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA
--Nano SIM
05.5
Battery Life
6580mAh Li - Ion Battery--
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
81.36
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 4.0
--GPS
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

Microsoft Surface 3 is much better than the OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, with a general score of 66.3 against 56.5. The OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi features a bit better processor than Microsoft Surface 3, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi also has more cores. The Microsoft Surface 3 has a little bit better display than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, because it has a little bit bigger display.

The OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi and the Microsoft Surface 3 both count with really similar storage capacity to install games and applications, both have equal internal memory capacity. The OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi features a superior battery performance than Microsoft Surface 3. OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi features a greater camera than Microsoft Surface 3, because it has a way more mega pixels camera.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.