Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
56.566.5
Basic Information
Microsoft
Android 14Windows 10
--2018-08-02
--9.65 x 6.89 x 0.33 inches
18.34 ounces18.41 ounces
Space Grey; Sky Blue16 777 216
--Metal
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
--$ 367.00
Display / Screen
10.1 inches10 inches
--1200 x 1800 pixels
IPS LCD --
--216 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.26.7
Performance
Rockchip RK3562 chipsetIntel Pentium 4415Y chipset
Octa-Core 2000 MHz processor64-bit, 14 nm (Dual-Core 1600 MHz) processor
4 GB RAM8 GB RAM
Mali-G52 GPUIntel HD Graphics 615 GPU
9.098.46
Storage
128 GB internal memory128 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
10.110.1
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP8.00 MP + 5.00 MP
f/2.00 aperture--
--1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution
7.926.49
Networks
--Wi-Fi
02.4
Battery Life
6580mAh Li - Ion Battery--
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
81.36
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 4.1
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The Microsoft Surface Go is much better than the OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, getting a 66.5 score against 56.5. Microsoft Surface Go comes with Windows 10 OS, while OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi counts with Android 14 OS. The Microsoft Surface Go counts with a bit sharper display than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, although it has a little bit smaller display.

The OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi counts with a bit superior processing unit than Microsoft Surface Go, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and faster). Microsoft Surface Go's memory capacity for games and applications is very similar to OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi's one, both have equal internal memory capacity.

The OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Microsoft Surface Go, because it has a lot more MP back camera. OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi has a much longer battery duration than Microsoft Surface Go.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.