Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
56.560.4
Basic Information
Samsung
Android 14Android 5.1 Lollipop
--2016-04-01
--7.36 x 4.28 x 0.34 inches
18.34 ounces9.98 ounces
Space Grey; Sky Blue16 777 216
--$ 150.00
Display / Screen
10.1 inches7 inches
--1280 x 800 pixels
IPS LCD TFT
--216 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.26.7
Performance
Rockchip RK3562 chipsetSamsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 chipset
Octa-Core 2000 MHz processorARM Cortex-A7, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor
4 GB RAM1,5 GB RAM
Mali-G52 GPUMali-T720 GPU
9.098.19
Storage
128 GB internal memory8 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot
10.16.06
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP5.00 MP + 2.00 MP
f/2.00 aperture--
--1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution
7.926.71
Networks
--Wi-Fi
02.4
Battery Life
6580mAh Li - Ion Battery4000mAh Li - Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
85.92
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 4.0
--GPS
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The Galaxy Tab A (2016) is a bit better than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, getting a overall score of 60.4 against 56.5. Both of these tablets use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Tab A (2016) has newer 5.1 Lollipop version while OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi has Android 14 version, offering a lot of extra features.

Galaxy Tab A (2016) features a slightly better looking display than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, although it has a really smaller screen. The OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi has a superior processing power than Galaxy Tab A (2016), because it has 4 more processing cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.

OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy Tab A (2016), because it has a 65% more battery size. OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Tab A (2016), because it has a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.