Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
56.564.4
Basic Information
Xiaomi
Android 14Android
--2014-05-15
--7.96 x 5.33 x 0.33 inches
18.34 ounces12.70 ounces
Space Grey; Sky Blue--
--$ 249.00
Display / Screen
10.1 inches7.9 inches
--1536 x 2048 pixels
IPS LCD --
--324 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
6.28.1
Performance
Rockchip RK3562 chipsetNvidia Tegra K1 chipset
Octa-Core 2000 MHz processorARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor
4 GB RAM2 GB RAM
Mali-G52 GPUKepler GPU
9.098.91
Storage
128 GB internal memory16 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot
10.16.72
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP8.00 MP + 5.00 MP
f/2.00 aperturef/2.00 aperture
--1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution
7.927.48
Networks
--Wi-Fi
02.4
Battery Life
6580mAh Li - Ion Battery6700mAh Battery
Non-Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
88.08
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The Xiaomi MiPad is better than the OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, getting a 64.4 score against 56.5. The OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi has just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi MiPad, because it has a greater amount of RAM and 4 more cores. Xiaomi MiPad features a much more vibrant display than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, although it has a way smaller screen.

The OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi counts with a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi MiPad, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi takes a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi MiPad, and although they both have a F2 diafragm aperture, the OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi also has a back camera with way more megapixels.

The Xiaomi MiPad has a little longer battery performance than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, because it has a 2% greater battery capacity.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.