Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
57.985.9
Basic Information
Apple
Android 14--
--2019-03-18
--9.80 x 6.80 x 0.24 inches
18.84 ounces16.37 ounces
Space Grey; Sky BlueGold, Gray and Silver
--Aluminum
--$ 779.00
Display / Screen
10.9 inches10.5 inches
--2224 x 1668 pixels
IPS LCD IPS LCD
--265 pixels per inch
--500 cd/m2 brightness
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.87.8
Performance
Unisoc T606 chipsetApple A12 Bionic APL1W81 chipset
Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2490 MHz) processor
8 GB RAM3 GB RAM
Mali-G57 GPUApple 4-core GPU GPU
8.9110.35
Storage
128 GB internal memory256 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
10.113.3
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP8.00 MP + 7.00 MP
f/2.00 aperturef/2.40 aperture
--1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution
7.928.91
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA
Nano SIMNano SIM, Dual SIM
06.1
Battery Life
7700mAh Li - Ion Battery8134mAh Li - Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
8.89.04
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 5.0
GPSGPS
--Fingerprint ID Scanner
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer, Barometer, Gyroscope and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The iPad Air (2019) is a lot better than OSCAL Pad 90, having a global score of 85.9 against 57.9. IPad Air (2019) features a quite better performance than OSCAL Pad 90, because although it has 5 GB less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the iPad Air (2019) also counts with a 64-bit processor.

IPad Air (2019) has a much more vibrant display than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a bit smaller display. The Apple iPad Air (2019) has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than OSCAL Pad 90, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The iPad Air (2019) counts with just a bit better battery performance than OSCAL Pad 90, because it has 8134mAh of battery capacity.

The Apple iPad Air (2019) shoots much clearer pictures and videos than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photography and a way less megapixels camera in the back.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.