Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
57.959.2
Basic Information
Fujitsu
Android 14Windows 8 Pro
--11.89 x 7.68 x 0.50 inches
18.84 ounces29.92 ounces
Space Grey; Sky Blue--
--$ 1149.00
Display / Screen
10.9 inches11.6 inches
--1366 x 768 pixels
IPS LCD AH-IPS
--135 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
5.86.9
Performance
Unisoc T606 chipset--
Octa-Core 1600 MHz processorIntel Core i5-3427U (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor
8 GB RAM4 GB (1600 MHz) RAM
Mali-G57 GPUIntel HD Graphics 4000 (650 MHz) GPU
8.918.91
Storage
128 GB internal memory256 GB internal memory
No SD card slotSD, SDHC external memory slot
10.113.3
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP5.00 MP
f/2.00 aperture--
--1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution
7.925.5
Networks
--Wi-Fi
Nano SIM--
02.4
Battery Life
7700mAh Li - Ion Battery3150mAh Li-Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
8.85.12
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 4.0
GPS--
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer

Comparison review

Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 is a little bit better than the OSCAL Pad 90, getting a 59.2 score against 57.9. The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 comes with Windows 8 Pro OS, and OSCAL Pad 90 comes with Android 14 OS. The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 features a much better screen than OSCAL Pad 90, because it has a quite bigger display.

The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 and OSCAL Pad 90 have similar processors, because although the Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than OSCAL Pad 90, because it has more internal memory capacity.

OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a much better battery life than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has a 144% greater battery capacity. The OSCAL Pad 90 has a very superior camera than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has a camera with much more MP.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.