Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
57.959.4
Basic Information
Google
Android 14Android 6.0
--2015-09-29
--9.53 x 7.05 x 0.28 inches
18.84 ounces17.60 ounces
Space Grey; Sky Blue--
--Aluminum
--$ 645.00
Display / Screen
10.9 inches10.2 inches
--2560 x 1800 pixels
IPS LCD LCD
--307 pixels per inch
--500 cd/m2 brightness
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
5.89
Performance
Unisoc T606 chipsetNVIDIA Tegra X1 chipset
Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor processor
8 GB RAM3 GB RAM
Mali-G57 GPUNVIDIA Maxwell GPU
8.916.03
Storage
128 GB internal memory64 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
10.17.7
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP8.00 MP + 2.10 MP
f/2.00 aperture--
--1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution
7.926.49
Networks
--Wi-Fi
Nano SIM--
02.4
Battery Life
7700mAh Li - Ion Battery--
Non-Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
8.81.36
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 4.1
GPSGPS
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

Google Pixel C is just a bit better than OSCAL Pad 90, having a overall score of 59.4 against 57.9. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Google Pixel C has older 6.0 version while OSCAL Pad 90 has Android 14 version. The OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Google Pixel C, because it has a greater number of cores and 5 GB more RAM memory.

Google Pixel C counts with a way better display than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a bit smaller screen. OSCAL Pad 90 features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel C, because it has more internal memory capacity. The OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel C.

The OSCAL Pad 90 has a lot better camera than Google Pixel C, because it has a camera with way more mega-pixels.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.