Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
57.966.3
Basic Information
Microsoft
Android 14--
--2015-05-01
--10.51 x 7.36 x 0.34 inches
18.84 ounces21.92 ounces
Space Grey; Sky Blue--
--$ 375.00
Display / Screen
10.9 inches10.8 inches
--1280 x 1920 pixels
IPS LCD --
--214 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.86.8
Performance
Unisoc T606 chipsetIntel Atom x7 Z8700 chipset
Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor
8 GB RAM4 GB RAM
Mali-G57 GPUIntel HD GPU
8.918.55
Storage
128 GB internal memory128 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
10.110.1
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP8.00 MP + 3.50 MP
f/2.00 aperture--
--1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution
7.926.49
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA
Nano SIMNano SIM
05.5
Battery Life
7700mAh Li - Ion Battery--
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
8.81.36
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 4.0
GPSGPS
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

The Microsoft Surface 3 has a global score of 66.3, which is much better than OSCAL Pad 90's 57.9 score. The OSCAL Pad 90 counts with just a little better performance than Microsoft Surface 3, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of 1600 megahertz cores. Microsoft Surface 3 has a better looking display than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a quite smaller display.

The OSCAL Pad 90 has a way better camera than Microsoft Surface 3, because it has a lot more megapixels back-facing camera. OSCAL Pad 90 and Microsoft Surface 3 have incredibly similar storage capacity to install games and applications, they have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. The OSCAL Pad 90 has a really longer battery life than Microsoft Surface 3.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.