Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
57.972.2
Basic Information
Microsoft
Android 14Windows 8.1 Pro
--2014-05-20
--11.50 x 7.93 x 0.36 inches
18.84 ounces28.16 ounces
Space Grey; Sky BlueGray
--Metal
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
--$ 700.00
Display / Screen
10.9 inches12 inches
--2160 x 1440 pixels
IPS LCD IPS LCD
--216 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
5.87.3
Performance
Unisoc T606 chipsetIntel Core i7 chipset
Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor4300U (Dual-Core 1600 MHz) processor
8 GB RAM8 GB RAM
Mali-G57 GPUIntel HD Graphics GPU
8.918.46
Storage
128 GB internal memory512 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
10.117.6
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP5.00 MP + 5.00 MP
f/2.00 aperture--
--1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution
7.926.05
Networks
--Wi-Fi
Nano SIM--
02.4
Battery Life
7700mAh Li - Ion Battery--
Non-Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
8.81.36
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 4.0
GPS--
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope

Comparison review

The Microsoft Surface Pro 3 has a score of 72.2, which is a lot better than OSCAL Pad 90's 57.9 overall score. Microsoft Surface Pro 3 counts with Windows 8.1 Pro OS, while OSCAL Pad 90 has Android 14 OS. The OSCAL Pad 90 features a little better performance than Microsoft Surface Pro 3, and although they both have 8 GB of RAM memory, the OSCAL Pad 90 also has a greater number of 1600 megahertz cores.

The Microsoft Surface Pro 3 features a much more vibrant screen than OSCAL Pad 90, because it has a little bigger display. The Microsoft Surface Pro 3 counts with much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than OSCAL Pad 90, because it has 384 GB more internal storage. The OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a way better battery performance than Microsoft Surface Pro 3.

The OSCAL Pad 90 shoots greater videos and photos than Microsoft Surface Pro 3, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more MP.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.