Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
57.964.4
Basic Information
Android 14Android 13
--9.70 x 6.15 x 0.30 inches
18.84 ounces15.84 ounces
Space Grey; Sky Blue--
--Plastic and Plastic
Display / Screen
10.9 inches10.4 inches
--1200 x 1200 pixels
IPS LCD IPS LCD
--163 pixels per inch
--330 cd/m2 brightness
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.86.7
Performance
Unisoc T606 chipsetUnisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset
Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor
8 GB RAM8 GB RAM
Mali-G57 GPUMali-G57 MC1 GPU
8.918.91
Storage
128 GB internal memory256 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot
10.117.34
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP13.00 MP + 16.00 MP
f/2.00 aperture--
7.927.04
Networks
--Wi-Fi
Nano SIM--
02.4
Battery Life
7700mAh Li - Ion Battery8280mAh Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
8.89.2
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 5.0
GPSGPS
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor
--FM Radio

Comparison review

The OSCAL Pad 15 is better than OSCAL Pad 90, getting a 64.4 score against 57.9. Both of these tablets include Android OS, but OSCAL Pad 15 has the previous 13 version while OSCAL Pad 90 has Android 14. The OSCAL Pad 15's CPU is very similar to OSCAL Pad 90's processing unit, both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount.

The OSCAL Pad 15 features a sharper screen than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a little smaller display. The OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a superior camera than OSCAL Pad 15. Both of them have the same resolution back camera. OSCAL Pad 15 counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than OSCAL Pad 90, because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB more internal memory.

OSCAL Pad 15 features a bit superior battery lifetime than OSCAL Pad 90, because it has an 8280mAh battery capacity.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.