Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
57.958.1
Basic Information
Samsung
Android 14Android 4.0.4, 3.0
--2011-03-22
--10.09 x 6.81 x 0.34 inches
18.84 ounces19.93 ounces
Space Grey; Sky Blue--
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
--$ 410.00
Display / Screen
10.9 inches10.1 inches
--1280 x 800 pixels
IPS LCD TFT
--149 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
5.87
Performance
Unisoc T606 chipset--
Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor
8 GB RAM--
Mali-G57 GPUYes GPU
8.917.47
Storage
128 GB internal memory32 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
10.15.8
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP3.00 MP + 2.00 MP
f/2.00 aperture--
--1920 x 1080 (24 fps) (Full HD) video resolution
7.926.49
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
Nano SIMSIM
03.9
Battery Life
7700mAh Li - Ion Battery6800mAh Li-Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
8.88.16
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
GPSGPS
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 has a global score of 58.1, which is slightly better than the OSCAL Pad 90's overall score of 57.9. Both devices in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 has 4.0.4 version and OSCAL Pad 90 has Android 14, so it gives some additional features and performance tweaks.

OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a faster CPU than Galaxy Tab 10.1, because it has more CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 counts with a lot better display than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a bit smaller screen. OSCAL Pad 90 features a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.

OSCAL Pad 90 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Tab 10.1, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels. OSCAL Pad 90 counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1, because it has 7700mAh of battery capacity instead of 6800mAh.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.