Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.9 | 70.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-06-01 |
| -- | 10.01 x 6.11 x 0.32 inches |
| 18.84 ounces | 18.52 ounces |
| Space Grey; Sky Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.9 inches | 10.1 inches |
| -- | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super PLS LCD |
| -- | 224 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.8 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T606 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 GPU | Mali-T830 MP2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 7.16 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 0 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.8 | 8.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) has a score of 70.2, which is way better than OSCAL Pad 90's general score of 57.9. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) has 8.1 Oreo version and OSCAL Pad 90 has Android 14 version, giving a lot of extra features. The Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) counts with a more vivid display than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a quite smaller display.
OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The OSCAL Pad 90 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016), and although they both have 8 cores, the OSCAL Pad 90 also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) takes a little bit better pictures and videos than OSCAL Pad 90, because although it has a camera in the back with way less MP, it also counts with a bigger aperture. The OSCAL Pad 90 features just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016), because it has 7700mAh of battery capacity against 7300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.