Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.9 | 74.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-08-24 |
| -- | 10.24 x 6.34 x 0.31 inches |
| 18.84 ounces | 18.84 ounces |
| Space Grey; Sky Blue | Black, Blue and Gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.9 inches | 10.5 inches |
| -- | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| -- | 216 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.8 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T606 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 0 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.8 | 8.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 is a lot better than OSCAL Pad 90, with a score of 74.5 against 57.9. These devices include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 has a newer 9.0 Pie version while OSCAL Pad 90 has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 is a noticeably thicker device than OSCAL Pad 90, but they weight the same.
OSCAL Pad 90 and Galaxy Tab A 10.5 count with similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy Tab A 10.5 has 5 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 counts with a better looking display than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a bit smaller display. OSCAL Pad 90 has slightly more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
OSCAL Pad 90 features a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5, because it has 7700mAh of battery capacity against 7300mAh. The Galaxy Tab A 10.5 counts with a bit better camera than OSCAL Pad 90, because although it has a way worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.