Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
57.962.8
Basic Information
Samsung
Android 14Android 7.1 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow, 5.0 Lollipop
--2015-05-02
--8.20 x 5.43 x 0.29 inches
18.84 ounces11.04 ounces
Space Grey; Sky Blue16 777 216
--$ 159.00
Display / Screen
10.9 inches8 inches
--1024 x 768 pixels
IPS LCD TFT
--160 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.86.2
Performance
Unisoc T606 chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset
Octa-Core 1600 MHz processorARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor
8 GB RAM1,5 GB RAM
Mali-G57 GPUAdreno 306 GPU
8.918.1
Storage
128 GB internal memory16 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot
10.16.72
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP5.00 MP + 2.00 MP
f/2.00 aperture--
--1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution
7.926.05
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
--LTE (4G) and HSPA
Nano SIM--
06
Battery Life
7700mAh Li - Ion Battery4200mAh Li - Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
8.86.08
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 4.1
GPSGPS
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The Galaxy Tab A 8.0 is a bit better than the OSCAL Pad 90, getting a 62.8 score against 57.9. Both tablets in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Tab A 8.0 has a more recent 7.1 Nougat version while OSCAL Pad 90 has Android 14 version. The OSCAL Pad 90 features a bit superior processor than Galaxy Tab A 8.0, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more cores.

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 counts with a little bit better screen than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a way smaller screen. OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Tab A 8.0, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.

The OSCAL Pad 90 has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Tab A 8.0, because it has a 7700mAh battery size against 4200mAh. The OSCAL Pad 90 has a much better camera than Galaxy Tab A 8.0, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot better 13 MP resolution.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.