Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.9 | 74.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4 |
| -- | 2014-01-06 |
| -- | 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.29 inches |
| 18.84 ounces | 16.54 ounces |
| Space Grey; Sky Blue | White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 539.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.9 inches | 10.1 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super Clear LCD |
| -- | 299 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T606 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 0 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 8220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.8 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 has a score of 74.6, which is a lot better than the OSCAL Pad 90's 57.9 overall score. Both devices in this review use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 has 4.4 version while OSCAL Pad 90 has Android 14. Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 counts with an incredibly better screen than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a quite smaller screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 counts with just a little better hardware performance than OSCAL Pad 90, because although it has less RAM memory and 4 lesser cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processor. OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1, because it has a lot more megapixels back camera.
OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 counts with a little better battery performance than OSCAL Pad 90, because it has 8220mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.