Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
57.978.4
Basic Information
Samsung
Android 14Android 13
--2023-10-04
--6.53 x 10.01 x 0.26 inches
18.84 ounces18.48 ounces
Space Grey; Sky Blue--
--Aluminum and Aluminum
Display / Screen
10.9 inches10.9 inches
--2304 x 1440 pixels
IPS LCD IPS LCD
--249 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.87.2
Performance
Unisoc T606 chipsetExynos 1380 S5E8835 (5 nm) chipset
Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor Octa-Core 2400 MHz processor
8 GB RAM6 GB RAM
Mali-G57 GPUMali G68 MP5 GPU
8.919.36
Storage
128 GB internal memory128 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
10.110.1
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP8.00 MP + 12.00 MP
f/2.00 aperture--
7.926.6
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--5G, 5G
Nano SIM--
06.4
Battery Life
7700mAh Li - Ion Battery8000mAh Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
8.88.96
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 5.3
GPSGPS
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer, Gyroscope and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The Galaxy Tab S9 FE has a general score of 78.4, which is much better than OSCAL Pad 90's 57.9 score. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Tab S9 FE has older 13 version and OSCAL Pad 90 has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE counts with a little bit better hardware performance than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.

The Galaxy Tab S9 FE has a much better display than OSCAL Pad 90. Both of them have a same size display. OSCAL Pad 90 features a greater camera than Galaxy Tab S9 FE, because it has a much higher 13 megapixels resolution back camera. Galaxy Tab S9 FE's memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is just as good as OSCAL Pad 90's one, both of them have equal internal memory.

Galaxy Tab S9 FE features a bit longer battery performance than OSCAL Pad 90, because it has a 4% more battery size.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.