Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.9 | 75 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Windows 10 Pro |
| -- | 2016-02-01 |
| -- | 11.43 x 7.83 x 0.25 inches |
| 18.84 ounces | 24.55 ounces |
| Space Grey; Sky Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.9 inches | 12 inches |
| -- | 1440 x 2160 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 216 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.8 | 6.8 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T606 chipset | Intel Core M chipset |
| Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor | 64-bit (Dual-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 7.92 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 0 | 5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 8.8 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy TabPro S has a general score of 75, which is a lot better than the OSCAL Pad 90's 57.9 overall score. Galaxy TabPro S has Windows 10 Pro OS, while OSCAL Pad 90 comes with Android 14 OS. The OSCAL Pad 90 has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy TabPro S, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy TabPro S counts with a sharper screen than OSCAL Pad 90, because it has a little bigger display. The Galaxy TabPro S features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than OSCAL Pad 90, because it has more internal memory. The OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy TabPro S, because it has a 7700mAh battery capacity.
The OSCAL Pad 90 captures a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy TabPro S, because it has a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.