Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
57.961.5
Basic Information
Samsung
Android 14--
--2015-11-08
--17.79 x 10.86 x 0.47 inches
18.84 ounces93.48 ounces
Space Grey; Sky Blue16 777 216
--$ 599.00
Display / Screen
10.9 inches18.4 inches
--1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD)
IPS LCD TFT
--120 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.85.9
Performance
Unisoc T606 chipsetSamsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 chipset
Octa-Core 1600 MHz processorARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor
8 GB RAM2 GB RAM
Mali-G57 GPUMali-T720 MP2 GPU
8.918.73
Storage
128 GB internal memory64 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot
10.110.02
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP2.10 MP
f/2.00 aperture--
7.920.55
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
--LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSUPA
Nano SIMNano SIM
05.7
Battery Life
7700mAh Li - Ion Battery5700mAh Li - Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
8.87.36
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 4.1
GPSGPS
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The Samsung Galaxy View has a global score of 61.5, which is just a bit better than OSCAL Pad 90's 57.9 general score. Samsung Galaxy View has a bit sharper display than OSCAL Pad 90, because it has a way bigger screen. OSCAL Pad 90 has just a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy View, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.

OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy View, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OSCAL Pad 90 also has a higher amount of RAM. The OSCAL Pad 90 features superior battery performance than Galaxy View, because it has a 7700mAh battery capacity against 5700mAh.

OSCAL Pad 90 features a lot better camera than Galaxy View.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.