Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
57.965.3
Basic Information
Samsung
Android 14Android 8.1 Oreo
--2019-04-26
--16.43 x 10.37 x 0.68 inches
18.84 ounces78.72 ounces
Space Grey; Sky Blue16 777 216
--$ 740.00
Display / Screen
10.9 inches17.3 inches
--1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD)
IPS LCD IPS LCD
--127 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.86
Performance
Unisoc T606 chipsetSamsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset
Octa-Core 1600 MHz processorARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor
8 GB RAM3 GB RAM
Mali-G57 GPUMali-G71 MP2 GPU
8.918.73
Storage
128 GB internal memory64 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot
10.111.34
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP5.00 MP
f/2.00 aperture--
7.920.66
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
--LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA
Nano SIMNano SIM
06.3
Battery Life
7700mAh Li - Ion Battery12000mAh Li - Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
8.811.44
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 5.0, EDR
GPSGPS
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The Galaxy View 2 is better than OSCAL Pad 90, having a score of 65.3 against 57.9. Both tablets we are comparing here work with Android OS, but Galaxy View 2 has 8.1 Oreo version while OSCAL Pad 90 has Android 14 version, providing a couple additional features and a performance increase. Galaxy View 2 has a little bit better display than OSCAL Pad 90, because it has a really bigger display.

The OSCAL Pad 90 features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy View 2, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OSCAL Pad 90 also has a larger amount of RAM. The OSCAL Pad 90 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy View 2. The Samsung Galaxy View 2 features a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than OSCAL Pad 90, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 400 GB.

The Galaxy View 2 has a superior battery duration than OSCAL Pad 90, because it has 12000mAh of battery capacity instead of 7700mAh.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.