Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
57.964.4
Basic Information
Xiaomi
Android 14Android
--2014-05-15
--7.96 x 5.33 x 0.33 inches
18.84 ounces12.70 ounces
Space Grey; Sky Blue--
--$ 249.00
Display / Screen
10.9 inches7.9 inches
--1536 x 2048 pixels
IPS LCD --
--324 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
5.88.1
Performance
Unisoc T606 chipsetNvidia Tegra K1 chipset
Octa-Core 1600 MHz processorARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor
8 GB RAM2 GB RAM
Mali-G57 GPUKepler GPU
8.918.91
Storage
128 GB internal memory16 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot
10.16.72
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP8.00 MP + 5.00 MP
f/2.00 aperturef/2.00 aperture
--1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution
7.927.48
Networks
--Wi-Fi
Nano SIM--
02.4
Battery Life
7700mAh Li - Ion Battery6700mAh Battery
Non-Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
8.88.08
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth
GPS--
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor

Comparison review

Xiaomi MiPad has a score of 64.4, which is much better than OSCAL Pad 90's 57.9 general score. The Xiaomi MiPad counts with a CPU that's just as good as the CPU in OSCAL Pad 90, although the Xiaomi MiPad has lesser processing cores and a lower amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi MiPad has a much sharper display than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a lot smaller display.

The OSCAL Pad 90 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi MiPad, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the OSCAL Pad 90 also has a camera with way more megapixels. The OSCAL Pad 90 features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi MiPad, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.

The OSCAL Pad 90 features just a little bit longer battery life than Xiaomi MiPad, because it has a 15% greater battery capacity.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.