Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 64.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-08-20 | 2016-03-31 |
| 9.89 x 6.70 x 0.59 inches | 9.40 x 6.60 x 0.24 inches |
| 30.12 ounces | 15.66 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 9.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 2048 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 224 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| 360 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) chipset | Apple A9X APL1021 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2000 MHz processor | Twister, 64-bit, 16 nm (Dual-Core 2260 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC1 GPU | PowerVR Series 7XT GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 13000mAh Battery | 7306mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 12 | 8.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPad Pro 9.7-inch has a general score of 80, which is much better than OSCAL Spider 8's 64.4 general score. The iPad Pro 9.7-inch body is much thinner and way lighter than OSCAL Spider 8, even though it was released many years before. OSCAL Spider 8 has a little bit better hardware performance than iPad Pro 9.7-inch, because it has more cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The OSCAL Spider 8 has a bit more vivid display than iPad Pro 9.7-inch, because although it has a bit worse 1200 x 1920 pixels resolution and a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit larger display. OSCAL Spider 8 has a quite bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than iPad Pro 9.7-inch, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The iPad Pro 9.7-inch shoots much clearer pictures and videos than OSCAL Spider 8, although it has a less mega-pixels back-facing camera. The OSCAL Spider 8 has a much better battery performance than iPad Pro 9.7-inch, because it has 13000mAh of battery capacity against 7306mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.