Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 64.4 | 66.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4, 4.1.2, 4.1, 4.0 |
| 2023-08-20 | 2012-02-27 |
| 9.89 x 6.70 x 0.59 inches | 10.31 x 7.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 30.12 ounces | 21.16 ounces |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 435.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super PLS LCD |
| 224 pixels per inch | 149 pixels per inch |
| 360 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 6.6 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2000 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC1 GPU | ARM Mali GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 9.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 2.4 | 4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 13000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 12 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 10.1 has an overall score of 66.3, which is a little bit better than the OSCAL Spider 8's overall score of 64.4. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS, but Galaxy Note 10.1 has the previous 4.4 version and OSCAL Spider 8 has Android 13 version. The Galaxy Note 10.1 body is much lighter and much thinner than the OSCAL Spider 8, although it was released 12 years before.
OSCAL Spider 8 has a superior hardware performance than Galaxy Note 10.1, because it has a larger number of cores (and faster) and 6 GB more RAM. OSCAL Spider 8 counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy Note 10.1, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the OSCAL Spider 8 also has a way higher screen pixel density and a much higher 1200 x 1920 resolution.
OSCAL Spider 8 captures greater photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 10.1, because it has a way higher resolution back camera. The OSCAL Spider 8 counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 10.1, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
OSCAL Spider 8 features a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 10.1, because it has a 13000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.