Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 64.4 | 60.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 5.1 Lollipop |
| 2023-08-20 | 2016-04-01 |
| 9.89 x 6.70 x 0.59 inches | 7.36 x 4.28 x 0.34 inches |
| 30.12 ounces | 9.98 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 7 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 224 pixels per inch | 216 pixels per inch |
| 360 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 6.7 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2000 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 1,5 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC1 GPU | Mali-T720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.19 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 6.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 6.71 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 13000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The OSCAL Spider 8 has a general score of 64.4, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Tab A (2016)'s global score of 60.4. Both tablets in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but OSCAL Spider 8 has an older 13 version and Galaxy Tab A (2016) has Android 5.1 Lollipop version. Although the OSCAL Spider 8 is newer than the Galaxy Tab A (2016), it's much heavier and thicker.
OSCAL Spider 8 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Tab A (2016), because it has a way higher 1200 x 1920px resolution, a way larger screen and a bit more pixels per inch of screen. OSCAL Spider 8 counts with a faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016), because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM memory.
OSCAL Spider 8 counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Tab A (2016), because it has more internal memory and a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB. OSCAL Spider 8 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy Tab A (2016), because it has a back-facing camera with a much better 13 mega-pixels resolution.
The OSCAL Spider 8 features a way better battery duration than Galaxy Tab A (2016), because it has 13000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.