Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
59.367.4
Basic Information
LG
Android 14Android 5.1 Lollipop
--2015-09-01
--10.01 x 6.34 x 0.31 inches
17.46 ounces17.18 ounces
Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue16 777 216
Display / Screen
10.5 inches10.1 inches
--1920 x 1200 pixels
IPS LCD IPS LCD
--224 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.86.9
Performance
Unisoc T606 (12 nm) chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset
Octa-Core 1600 MHz processorKrait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor
6 GB RAM2 GB RAM
Mali-G57 GPUAdreno 330 GPU
8.828.91
Storage
256 GB internal memory16 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot
13.311.36
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP5.00 MP + 2.00 MP
f/2.00 aperture--
--1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution
7.926.93
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA
06
Battery Life
8200mAh Li - Ion Battery7400mAh Li - Polymer Battery
Non-Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
9.128.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 4.1
--GPS
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor

Comparison review

LG G Pad II 10.1 is better than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, with a score of 67.4 against 59.3. These tablets use Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G Pad II 10.1 has 5.1 Lollipop version while OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has Android 14. LG G Pad II 10.1 has a bit more powerful CPU than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has lesser cpu cores (although they are faster) and lesser RAM.

LG G Pad II 10.1 has a better screen than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has a bit smaller display. The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi shoots much better pictures and videos than LG G Pad II 10.1, because it has a much better 13 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with a bigger memory to install games and applications than LG G Pad II 10.1, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.

The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi features a bit superior battery life than LG G Pad II 10.1, because it has 8200mAh of battery capacity instead of 7400mAh.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.