Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
59.366.3
Basic Information
Microsoft
Android 14--
--2015-05-01
--10.51 x 7.36 x 0.34 inches
17.46 ounces21.92 ounces
Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue--
--$ 375.00
Display / Screen
10.5 inches10.8 inches
--1280 x 1920 pixels
IPS LCD --
--214 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.86.8
Performance
Unisoc T606 (12 nm) chipsetIntel Atom x7 Z8700 chipset
Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor
6 GB RAM4 GB RAM
Mali-G57 GPUIntel HD GPU
8.828.55
Storage
256 GB internal memory128 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
13.310.1
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP8.00 MP + 3.50 MP
f/2.00 aperture--
--1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution
7.926.49
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA
--Nano SIM
05.5
Battery Life
8200mAh Li - Ion Battery--
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
9.121.36
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 4.0
--GPS
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

Microsoft Surface 3 is better than the OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, getting a general score of 66.3 against 59.3. The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi features a bit better CPU than Microsoft Surface 3, because it has a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. The Microsoft Surface 3 has a brighter display than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, because it has a little larger screen.

The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Microsoft Surface 3, because it has more internal memory. The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a very superior battery duration than Microsoft Surface 3. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi captures much better pictures and videos than Microsoft Surface 3, because it has a much better resolution camera.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.