Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 59.3 | 66.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4, 4.1.2, 4.1, 4.0 |
| -- | 2012-02-27 |
| -- | 10.31 x 7.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 17.46 ounces | 21.16 ounces |
| Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue | -- |
| -- | $ 435.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.5 inches | 10.1 inches |
| -- | 1280 x 800 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super PLS LCD |
| -- | 149 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.8 | 6.6 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T606 (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset |
| Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 GPU | ARM Mali GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0 | 4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.12 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 10.1 has a score of 66.3, which is better than the OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi's global score of 59.3. These devices include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 10.1 has an older 4.4 version and OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has Android 14 version. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of faster cores.
The Galaxy Note 10.1 has a more vivid screen than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has a bit smaller display. The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a much better memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, because it has a 17 percent bigger battery size. The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi captures greater photos and videos than Galaxy Note 10.1, because it has a much more mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.