Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 59.3 | 70.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-06-01 |
| -- | 10.01 x 6.11 x 0.32 inches |
| 17.46 ounces | 18.52 ounces |
| Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.5 inches | 10.1 inches |
| -- | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super PLS LCD |
| -- | 224 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.8 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T606 (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 GPU | Mali-T830 MP2 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 7.16 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 0 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.12 | 8.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) is much better than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, getting a overall score of 70.2 against 59.3. Both tablets in this review have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) has the newer 8.1 Oreo version and OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has Android 14, so it provides some extra features and performance optimizations.
The Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) has a brighter screen than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has a little smaller screen. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi also has a larger amount of RAM.
OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 240 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) has a slightly better camera than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, because although it has a lot worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016), because it has an 8200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.