Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 59.3 | 74.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-08-24 |
| -- | 10.24 x 6.34 x 0.31 inches |
| 17.46 ounces | 18.84 ounces |
| Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue | Black, Blue and Gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.5 inches | 10.5 inches |
| -- | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| -- | 216 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.8 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T606 (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 0 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.12 | 8.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 is a lot better than the OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, having a general score of 74.5 against 59.3. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has Android 14, offering a couple additional features.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 counts with a bit better processing power than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has 3 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy Tab A 10.5 has a more vivid display than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi. They have a screen with the same size. The Galaxy Tab A 10.5 takes a bit better videos and photos than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, because although it has a camera in the back with a much worse 8 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi features a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Tab A 10.5, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi features a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Tab A 10.5, because it has 8200mAh of battery capacity against 7300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.