Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
59.373.6
Basic Information
Samsung
Android 14--
--2015-09-03
--7.82 x 5.31 x 0.22 inches
17.46 ounces9.59 ounces
Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue--
--Metal
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
Display / Screen
10.5 inches8 inches
--2048 x 1536 pixels
IPS LCD Super AMOLED
--320 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.87.6
Performance
Unisoc T606 (12 nm) chipsetSamsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset
Octa-Core 1600 MHz processorARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor
6 GB RAM3 GB RAM
Mali-G57 GPUMali-T760 MP6 GPU
8.829
Storage
256 GB internal memory64 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot
13.310.02
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP8.00 MP + 2.10 MP
f/2.00 aperture--
--2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution
7.926.38
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA
05.7
Battery Life
8200mAh Li - Ion Battery4000mAh Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
9.125.92
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 4.1
--GPS
--Fingerprint ID Scanner
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The Galaxy Tab S2 8.0-inch has an overall score of 73.6, which is way better than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi's 59.3 overall score. Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0-inch features a much more vibrant display than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has a much smaller display. Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0-inch has a bit superior processing unit than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has 3 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.

The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Tab S2 8.0-inch, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy Tab S2 8.0-inch, because it has a 105 percent more battery capacity.

The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0-inch, because it has a way more mega-pixels back camera.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.